I
ponder the issue of identity a lot, and throughout Pride month, I was thinking
in particular about the issues of representation and inclusion/exclusion within
the LGBTQ community. I must confess that I’ve never attended a Pride parade. In
general, I’ve never derived pleasure from watching parades, and I don’t like crowds.
More importantly, the so-called community has never felt like a completely
inclusive one to me. My introduction to this space was in university. It seemed
very white and representative of very specific identities—namely, people who
identified with either the ‘L’, ‘G’, or (less so) ‘B’ in the acronym LGBTQ. Thankfully,
that acronym has been expanding over the years to acknowledge the existence of
different identities. To the best of my knowledge, it is currently LGBTQQIP2SAA (lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, pansexual, two-spirit, asexual, and
ally), sometimes referred to as ‘Alphabet Soup’ owing to its length.
But not everyone is eager to eat this soup. If you
think homophobic heterosexuals are a problem, you might be surprised to learn
how rampant racism
is in the LGBTQ community and how frequently same-sex attracted people dismiss
and promote the erasure of different sexual and gender identities. I suspect we’ve
all been guilty of assuming that someone is gay because they’re attracted to someone
of the same sex or of questioning the identity of a bisexual who is dating a
person of the opposite sex or of being insensitive to someone’s gender
identification. But it is crucial to learn from this and be more aware, more
receptive, more understanding, and more respectful. I was appalled the other
day when I read the comments on an article about this acronym. Rather than supporting
the recognition of the various sexual and gender identities, people were
complaining about how unnecessarily complicated it is—that people should just
identify as queer if not lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. In one of
these comments,
a woman derided those who want to expand LGBT and suggested that anyone who doesn’t
identify with one of these terms should ‘figure it out, like [she] did’.
From
this perspective, one might deduce that only three sexual orientations exist:
heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual. But it actually gets worse, as bi erasure and invisibility within
the so-called community are common. Ask any bisexual and you will hear stories
about being told to pick a side. So, what many people actually feel is that
only two legitimate sexual identities exist: straight and gay. This ignores the
countless people who occupy the enormous space between these two ends of the
sexuality spectrum and denies their right to self-define.
While reading up on Toronto Pride, I stumbled upon an article
titled ‘Why
are we erasing LGBT people from our own community?’ I assumed that it would
be about how we overlook the identities of our fellow queer people. On the
contrary, the article is critical of people who identify as anything other than
gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. The author—a white male—complains about
Pride Toronto’s mission to ‘[bring] people together to celebrate the history,
courage, diversity and future of our community’. I agree with him that ‘celebrating’
and not ‘demonstrating, promoting, and demanding rights and equality’ is a failure
on the part of the organizers, but I was disappointed that despite this
critique, he doesn’t get into a discussion about this. What I cannot agree with
is his criticism of the use of the ambiguous terms ‘people’ and ‘community’. Unlike
him, I commend Pride Toronto for acknowledging that not everyone identifies
with ‘LGBT’, and I agree with the organizers that dropping this signifier promotes
more inclusion. The author, however, argues that the terms lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender are ‘all-encompassing’, and thus those who do not
identify with one of them are manifesting internalized homophobia or
transphobia. That is one very privileged viewpoint!
How can a sexual minority
demand recognition of their sexual identity and deny others the same right? If
we truly believe that everyone should have equal rights, we must reject the
dominance of the white, cisgender, homosexual, middle class identity within the
rainbow. It promotes a homonormativity that aligns dangerously with a
capitalist culture that thrives on oppression. This is why many people of colour
don’t identify as gay or lesbian, despite being attracted to members of the
same sex. Furthermore, the corporatization of Pride that complements this
homogenization of the queer identity excludes and deters people who might
otherwise want to celebrate.
(Noah Berger/Reuters)
As
a Huffington Post blogger states, he chooses not to attend Pride because ‘it’s
for those members of the LGBT community who are the best customers for the
sponsoring brands and who fit an image of lithe, young, white male gayness’.
A look at Pride Toronto’s sponsors
this year is telling: several alcohol companies, Viagra (known to be used recreationally), TD Bank, Manulife Financial, Eska
Water, Smart… The target market is clearly affluent inhabitants of metros, who
like to party. Yep, ‘lithe, young, white male gayness’ sounds accurate.
This
celebration of capitalism in addition to the increased police presence is why
individuals and groups, like Black Lives Matter, opted
out of San Francisco’s Pride celebrations this year.
(Mel Evans/Associated Press)
Anyone
who can feel comfortable and safe in the presence of heavily armed police is
clearly privileged enough not to be suspicious of law enforcement, is unfamiliar
with the history
of the LGBTQ rights movement and the initiation of Pride, and is disinterested in
the ongoing history of discrimination and violence that people of colour are
facing at the hands of police. And, like me, they’ve probably been lucky enough
not to have had to do any real work for the cause, because so many have already
fought and/or lost their lives fighting for their basic right to be regarded as
human and non-criminal. Pride appears to be a battleground between those who
see identity as political and those who do not.
Like
white feminism, we seem to have a white homosexuality problem, where white
people lead the movement and are satisfied when they make progress and are okay
with leaving everyone else behind. This is perhaps best exemplified by the
struggle for marriage equality that does nothing to mitigate or eradicate
pressing issues such as laws that allow for discriminating against people on
the basis of their sexual or gender identity, the continued brutalization and
murder of trans women of colour, homelessness among queer youth, the high rate
of domestic violence that bisexual women face, etc. Of course, this is not to
say that I oppose same-sex marriage. I only wish that those who’ve fought for
that right would also pursue securing the rights of others, who continue to fight for
their very survival. Until your LGBT rights encompass the rights of all sexual
and gender minorities, what is there to be proud of?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.