Like
many, I’m still reeling from the result of the U.S. election. I watched with
dread as the U.S. map turned mostly red. I felt an intense fear for the safety
of racialized, queer, and trans Americans, given the hornet’s nest of macho,
hypermasculine, white nationalism that Trump had stirred up to get votes. The
reality of this outcome was overwhelming to say the least, but the outcome
shouldn’t have come as a surprise.
As
I’ve said before, this was the quintessential
American running for the highest office of the United States of America. Of
course this happened! What else would happen when capitalism is treated like a
religion, with wealth worshipped, celebrity revered, inequities maintained to
support the pursuit of wealth of those at the top of the pyramid, poverty
reviled as a sign of laziness, and humanity dismissed as weakness? Nevertheless,
as history was unfolding on Tuesday night, I chose to be in denial. My
disillusionment with politics in general had led me to believe that “the
system” wanted Hillary Clinton, and therefore she would be the next President
of the United States, even if the election was close.
This
mistake is exactly the problem. I never took Trump seriously. I thought his
presence was strictly to ensure his opponent’s victory. It looked like the
Democratic Party agreed, because Clinton didn’t put up a very good fight. In
the debates, she stood by and made faces and she didn’t really challenge Trump
on what he said. In the second debate, she even let him get away with changing
the subject to ISIS when he was asked directly about sexual assault. I don’t
know if she and her party were taking voters that much for granted to think
that all they needed to do was say “Look at this buffoon!” and the votes would automatically
go to Clinton, or if we were duped and Trump always had it in the bag. After
all, he kept repeating, “The system is rigged.” The point is that this result was
inevitable, and anyone who didn’t think it was at least possible is part of the
problem—and that includes people like me.
The
world we inhabit today is cutting us off from reality. We interact more with
the Internet than our neighbours and in so doing, we control the content we see
and read, and we can block or filter out dissimilar voices and create a bubble
of consensus that we share with like-minded individuals. The result is that we
don’t necessarily know what others are thinking, and so we have the Republicans
taking the U.S. Electoral College, when all the polls projected a Democrat win.
After the election, liberals and the pundits of their ilk were quick to dismiss
Trump voters—the same behaviour that helped him emerge victorious. When Hillary
Clinton referred to half of Trump supporters as the “basket of deplorables” she
showed how arrogant and out of touch she was. Did she really believe that she
could insult thousands of people and there would be no backlash? Or was she so cocky
that she thought she could alienate that many people and it wouldn’t make a
difference to her campaign? No one likes being spoken to condescendingly or
being insulted.
Although
the conditions that created this result are complex, it is undeniable that racism
was the main factor in this election. Anyone who wishes to argue otherwise is
blind to the white supremacy that is the foundation of all settler states
including my own country. Speaking of which, those who were able to look past
the racism in Trump’s campaign and still vote for him showed that racism isn’t
really a problem for them. Misogyny also played a part. Men and women are not
measured by the same standards, and North Americans like to judge the rest of
the world while pretending things are perfectly fine here. They are not. But I’m
less concerned about gender right now than I am about the failures of
liberalism. By continuing to brush off Trump voters as nothing more than
ignorant, crazy, racist sexists, we will continue to look like egotistical
ideologues and we will fail to notice as they organize further. As I see it,
this is the key difference between liberals and conservatives—the former have
no plan, while the latter are increasingly mobilizing to get what they want.
And if what they want isn’t what you, in the centre and on the Left, want, then
wipe your tears, forget this “love trumps hate” claptrap, stop being surprised by announcements like the one that racist
ideologue Stephen Bannon is on Trump’s team, and organize.
Given
the popularity of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump in the party leadership
races, it was clear that a large number of Americans wanted change. Clinton was
the antithesis of that. So, there you go. Of course the Democrats were punished
for putting Clinton forward as their candidate! Now large numbers of liberals—many
of them white by the look of it—are hashtagging and marching in the streets.
Where were those people when Black Lives Matter was doing the same thing? Where
were they when the police were increasingly killing unarmed Black adults and children, and militarizing to keep
the public in line? Where were they when the Right was targeting transgender
people, fear mongering about washrooms while ignoring the rising murder rates, especially among trans people of colour? Where were they when
Obama was setting a record for deportations? Bernie Sanders
may have been offering something different, but he alienated many people when
he and his supporters tried to tone police Black Lives Matter activists. He
showed them that they could expect more white liberalism with him.
The
political class is an entity unto itself. The “outsider” whom thousands of
Americans are hoping will understand their struggles and “make their country
great again” is a white billionaire who was born into wealth. It is entirely
illogical. Anyone who argues that this man is the saviour of the proletariat is
either incredibly ignorant or trying to conceal their own white nationalism. In
addition to this, my takeaway from Trump’s successful entry into politics is that
there is a certain kind of “outsider” that gets to infiltrate the political
establishment—a billionaire. Talk about being out of touch. Why do we, in our
so-called democracies, continue to be satisfied with choosing whom we perceive
to be the lesser of the evils? Why do people get angry and try to shame others
who choose not to vote or who vote for third-party candidates? This election,
with its low voter turnout and victory for Trump, is evidence that a lot of
people are dissatisfied with a system that they don’t feel exists for them.
Americans
(and Canadians) need actual change. If you agree that Donald Trump shouldn’t be
president, then you hopefully see that real change means the obliteration of the
entire system of whiteness that is responsible for white supremacy. Anger and
vitriol have become the norm in political/social discourse. It certainly helps
when our mainstream media normalize racism by propagating the use of terms like
“Alt Right.” I have never used this term because, to me, it legitimizes an
ideology that should remain on the fringe; rather, it’s taking over. That
should make you furious.
I
don’t care what angry white men say; I care what they’re given licence to do.
Liberals and leftists have been focusing too much on semantics and less on
what they stand for. Hillary Clinton was not the answer; she was a symptom of
the problem. She was doing what liberal politicians do: giving you destructive
neoliberal ideology in a friendly package. Where is the outrage at the
disparities in how white and racialized people have always been treated at all
levels of society? Indeed, things might get worse from here on out, but if you
can’t see that they were already horrible, then I don’t know what your cause is,
but it doesn’t look like social justice to me. Let me give you an example. Most
people, whether they’re friends with immigrants or not, are aware that a
person’s educational and professional qualifications from the developing world
are of no value in a country like Canada. Do you think that’s fair?
You
don’t have to be openly racist to support white supremacy. If you don’t hear
anyone else’s experiences and can’t see anyone else’s struggles, then you can’t
care about anyone else’s struggles. If you aren’t outraged at how our countries
work, maybe you’re more closely aligned with Trump’s white nationalism than you
think.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.