Imagine
going on a blind date in the dark. You must navigate a blank space, and really listen
to your date to get a sense of who he or she is. Imagine the depths that you
could reach in your conversation without the interference of superficialities.
Imagine having this freedom to open up and allow the other person to interact
with the real you.
Could you do
it, or would you ask questions, like in a job interview, coaxing your date to label
him- or herself as x, y, or z?
We are
supposed to choose a finite number of adjectives from an infinite list of
possibilities to neatly and concisely define ourselves. Since I work with
language for a living, I appreciate the ability to describe oneself using as
few or as many words as possible. But why do we attach labels to ourselves? Is
it to understand ourselves or to make ourselves understandable to others?
Understanding
myself has relied largely on playing with labels and then abandoning them when
I find them limiting. Further, allowing others to rely on labels to understand
me has always led to misunderstanding. Rigid definitions tend to lure people into
a false sense of comprehension without doing the work of probing.
For example…
I’m not
particularly patriotic. I like Canada, and I’m happy to have been born in
Canada. But do I think it’s “the greatest country in the world”? Well, no,
because I don’t believe that such a place exists. We all fit in in different
places. Those who feel comfortable in Canada should settle there; if they would
rather be elsewhere, they should settle elsewhere. I have lived abroad, and I
was happy. I think I can be happy in many different places.
I have no
burning desire to alter my relationship status. I am financially independent,
and I don’t need to conform to anyone else’s norm.
I eat
whatever I feel like eating, whether the ingredients were removed from the
ground, plucked from a bush or tree, or came from an animal. Sometimes, I go
for long stretches of time where I eat a plant-based diet, and then I might
crave a burger or some spicy chicken, so I have it.
I am
left-of-centre, but I feel no allegiance to a particular political party. My
membership to one of Canada’s main parties lapsed not long ago, and I have no
desire to renew it, as I want the freedom to vote any way I please.
I believe
that the universe is too amazing to just be an accident, but I embrace no
organized religion.
Not so neat
and tidy.
Yet non-compliance
when asked to define oneself can make the inquisitor uncomfortable, in turn, causing
discomfort for the subject. At various stages of my life, labelling myself has
made me feel vulnerable or empowered. Today, I feel free—free of needing to
define myself, free of worrying about what anyone thinks, free of pressure from
others to do or be any particular thing.
It’s fanfreakingtastic!
I recognize
how privileged I am to enjoy the freedom to be myself. I am under no pressure
from family members or society to do any particular thing with my life.
This isn’t
to suggest that I don’t use labels. If you read any prior posts, you will know
that I have indeed referred to myself as various things. It’s unavoidable. But
these are mere details.
I largely reject the idea that we should categorize ourselves. Perhaps this works for some people, but it has never felt right to me. I am—as we all are—so much more than boxes to tick.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.