When an important issue is up
for debate, I get frustrated when I hear people asking what I perceive to be the
wrong questions. Just this week, the news in India has been replete with
stories of violence against women, but it doesn’t seem like the reporters are
interested in the bigger picture. The public and the media express outrage at
the lack of governance and law enforcement when rape is committed, but what
about the mindset that underpins this crime?
On April 28, Jisha, a Dalit
law student, was found dead in her home in Ernakulam, Kerala. Her body had 38
wounds, there was evidence that she
had been raped, and her intestines had spilled out of her body. The public
knows her name, but not that of the alleged rapist. In fact, more than a week
later, the police still have no suspect.
Image courtesy Angela Ferrao (https://www.facebook.com/Ferraodesigns/)
The illustration above was done by
editorial cartoonist Angela Ferrao. Her work appears in a daily newspaper from
Monday to Friday, but this image was rejected for being “too horrific.” Yes, it
is horrific—but perhaps less horrific than what actually happened. It was meant
to be disturbing and provocative, to raise awareness about the brutality
committed against this woman and countless others.
Now, many people have likened
this murder to the gang rape and murder of Jyoti Singh in Delhi in 2012, but
aside from the comparable brutality of the removal of internal organs, there are
two striking differences. First, Jisha has not been afforded the anonymity that
Jyoti Singh was. The latter was referred to by the pseudonym ‘Nirbhaya’ (Braveheart or fearless), both preserving her confidentiality (and some would
argue, her dignity) and upholding her as a martyr. Why? Have journalists become
more enlightened in the last four years and adopted a new stance on a woman’s
honour, choosing to see the importance of allowing the victim the dignity of
her identity? I would argue no. I’ll get to that below.
The second difference I want
to highlight is that although Singh and her male companion were left to die on
the busy road, where passers-by chose not to act, the authorities were quick to
launch their investigation and the suspects were apprehended soon thereafter.
In Jisha’s case, however, it took pressure from the media and the National
Human Rights Commission to
get the investigation underway.
In 2012, the streets of Delhi
were teeming with protesters baying for the blood of the monsters who had
brutalized this young woman. Celebrities also got involved. Jaya Bachchan even cried in Parliament! Many sections of society, including the
immensely privileged, identified with Jyoti Singh. In her, they saw themselves
and their daughters. But today, this rape and gruesome murder of a Dalit
doesn’t seem to be inspiring the same waterfall of tears across the country. Let’s
face it: Jyoti was a middle class Brahmin, whereas Jisha was a lower class
Dalit. The societal structure dictates that these two lives are not of the same
value.
Many blame the government and
law enforcement for not doing their jobs. The masses will not acknowledge that
the root of the problem is much deeper. While a Dalit body is open to violence—as
evinced in the media on a regular basis—a Brahmin body is off limits; anyone
who dares to violate it has committed a great sin, clearly. What the two cases do
have in common is the exemplification of how women can be punished simply for
being visible, for pursuing their interests and aspirations. But no, the vicious
rape and butchering of Jisha is not another ‘Nirbhaya’ case. You cannot erase
her caste. Her caste should have been irrelevant during her life, but that
isn’t how life works in India. Had Jisha been of a higher caste, perhaps her
family wouldn’t have been harassed by their neighbours for 40 years. According
to her mother, Rajeshwari, the neighbours would throw stones at their
one-room house, destroyed their water pipes and would only allow them to draw
water from a canal next to
the house. That sounds suspiciously to me like casteism.
Image courtesy Angela Ferrao
Yes, women across all
sections of Indian society are harassed, molested, raped, and murdered. No one
is denying that. But when you deny that caste is an important part of Jisha’s
case, you disregard her struggles in life (and death), the unequal treatment
that people from different levels of the hierarchy receive both at the hands of
other citizens and before the law, and the disdain for the “Other” that is all
too obvious in this society. Until the public can acknowledge this and deal
with it, the violence will continue unchecked.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.